Comparison of euploid blastocyst expansion with subgroups of single chromosome, multiple chromosome, and segmental aneuploids using an AI platform from donor …

K Hori, K Hori, T Kosasa, B Walker, A Ohta… - Journal of Assisted …, 2023 - Springer
K Hori, K Hori, T Kosasa, B Walker, A Ohta, HJ Ahn, TTF Huang
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2023Springer
Purpose This retrospective observational study compares how different classes of blastocyst
genotypes from egg donor cycles differentially blastulate and expand using a standard
assay. Methods Quantitative measurements of expansion utilized a customized neural
network that segments all sequential time-lapse images during the first 10 h of expansion.
Results Analyses were performed using two developmental time perspectives using time-
lapse imaging. The first was the time to blastocyst formation (tB), which broadly reflects …
Purpose
This retrospective observational study compares how different classes of blastocyst genotypes from egg donor cycles differentially blastulate and expand using a standard assay.
Methods
Quantitative measurements of expansion utilized a customized neural network that segments all sequential time-lapse images during the first 10 h of expansion.
Results
Analyses were performed using two developmental time perspectives using time-lapse imaging. The first was the time to blastocyst formation (tB), which broadly reflects variations in developmental rate. Euploidy peaked at 100–115 h from fertilization. In contrast, aneuploidy peaks flanked this interval bi-modally. These distributions limit ploidy discrimination based upon traditional standard grading features when assessed in real time. In contrast, from the second perspective of progressive blastocyst expansion that is normalized to each individual blastocyst’s tB time, euploidy was significantly increased at expansion values > 20,000µ2 across all tB intervals studied. A Cartesian coordinate plot graphically summarizes information useful to rank order blastocysts within cohorts for transfer. Defined aneuploidy subgroups, distinguished by the number and complexity of chromosomes involved, also showed distributive differences from both euploids and from each other. A small subset of clinically significant trisomies did not show discriminating features separating them from other euploids.
Conclusion
A standard assay of blastocyst expansion normalized to each individual blastocyst’s time of blastocyst formation more usefully discriminates euploidy from aneuploidy than real-time expansion comparisons using absolute developmental time from fertilization.
Springer