Efficacy of troglitazone on body fat distribution in type 2 diabetes.

S Akazawa, F Sun, M Ito, E Kawasaki, K Eguchi - Diabetes care, 2000 - Am Diabetes Assoc
S Akazawa, F Sun, M Ito, E Kawasaki, K Eguchi
Diabetes care, 2000Am Diabetes Assoc
OBJECTIVE: The insulin-sensitizing action of troglitazone may be mediated through the
activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) and the
promotion of preadipocyte differentiation in adipose tissue on which troglitazone has depot-
specific effects. We investigated the relationship between efficacy of the drug and body fat
distribution. Changes in body fat distribution were also investigated by long-term
administration of the drug. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Troglitazone was given at …
OBJECTIVE: The insulin-sensitizing action of troglitazone may be mediated through the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) and the promotion of preadipocyte differentiation in adipose tissue on which troglitazone has depot-specific effects. We investigated the relationship between efficacy of the drug and body fat distribution. Changes in body fat distribution were also investigated by long-term administration of the drug. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Troglitazone was given at a dose of 400 mg/day to 20 patients with type 2 diabetes whose diet and sulfonylurea therapy produced unsatisfactory glycemic control (HbA(1c) >7.8%) and whose insulin secretory capacity was found to be preserved (postprandial C-peptide >3 ng/ml). HbA(1c) values, serum lipid levels, and body weight were measured monthly Body fat distribution was evaluated in subcutaneous (SC) and visceral fat using a computed tomography scan at umbilical levels before and after troglitazone therapy RESULTS: During the 1-year troglitazone treatment, HbA(1c) was significantly decreased (from 9.2 +/- 0.2 to 7.1 +/- 0.2%, P < 0.01), showing lowest values at 4-6 months, whereas body weight was significantly increased (BMI 24.6 +/- 0.6 to 25.7 +/- 0.6 kg/m2, P < 0.01). Reduction of HbA(1c) (deltaHbA(1c)) from the baseline value during treatment was significantly greater in obese patients (BMI >26 kg/m2) than in nonobese patients (-3.2 +/- 0.4 vs. -2.1 +/- 0.3%, P < 0.05) and was more significant in women than in men (-3.2 +/- 0.2 vs. - 1.4 +/- 0.2%, P < 0.01). The level of deltaHbA(1c) during treatment showed a significant negative correlation with SC fat area (r = -0.742, P < 0.01) but not with visceral fat area. Weight gain during troglitazone treatment resulted in increased accumulation of SC fat without a change in visceral fat area and, consequently. in a significant decrease in the visceral-to-SC fat ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Predominant accumulation of SC fat for the visceral fat tissue was an important predictor of the efficacy of troglitazone therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Greater efficacy of troglitazone was observed in women who were characterized by more accumulation of SC adipose tissue than men. Long-term administration of the drug resulted in weight gain with increased accumulation of SC adipose tissue, probably because of the activation of PPAR-gamma in the region.
Am Diabetes Assoc